← Back to Dashboard
1. Latency Budgets and SLOs2. Concurrency and Backpressure
Latency Budgets and SLOs
📚 Performance and Throughput⏱ 10 min⭐ 100 XP⌨ Hands-on lab
Define Performance Targets Before Incidents
AI systems need explicit SLOs like any critical service. Without latency and reliability targets, scaling decisions become guesswork and every slowdown becomes a debate about whether it matters.
Decompose the Latency Budget
full latency is a sum of parts - budget each one so regressions are attributable:
User-perceived p95 target: 2,500ms
├─ API gateway + auth ≤ 60ms
├─ input validation/guardrail ≤ 120ms
├─ retrieval + rerank ≤ 350ms
├─ model TTFT (time to first token) ≤ 800ms
├─ generation (streamed) budget by output length
└─ post-processing + egress ≤ 100ms
For streaming UX, time-to-first-token is often the SLO that matters - users forgive long completions that start instantly.
AI-Specific SLO Dimensions
| Dimension | Example SLO | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Latency | p95 ≤ 2200ms, TTFT ≤ 900ms | Per endpoint, not global |
| Availability | 99.9% successful completion | Include fallback-served responses separately |
| Quality proxy | Task completion ≥ baseline − 2% | From online eval signals |
| Policy compliance | Guardrail pass rate ≥ 99.5% | Safety is an SLO, not a hope |
- Set p95 and p99 targets by endpoint - a chat UI and a batch enrichment job deserve different budgets.
- Track queue wait vs inference time separately - they need different fixes (capacity vs model choice).
- Alert on trend, not only hard breach - "p95 rising 10%/day" is actionable before users notice.
Error budget logic applies: if the quality SLO is burning too fast after a prompt release, that is a rollback trigger - the same discipline SRE applies to availability, extended to AI behavior.
⌨ HANDS-ON LABDefine AI SLOs
⭐ +150 XPSet production service level objectives for latency, safety, and completion quality.
1Create an SLO policy file.
2Add alert thresholds for violations.
OBJECTIVE 1 / 2 — type "hint" if stuck
🧪 Knowledge Check
Press 1-4 to select1 of 2
Why are p95/p99 targets critical?
They are optional vanity metrics
They capture tail latency user pain
They replace all logs
They only matter offline